MOTmotdata.uk

Ford Ka

MOT data from 300,412 tests in 2024. Pass rate: 77.8%. Average mileage at test: 58,749 miles.

Common failure reasons

ReasonCount
a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn18,072
the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired9,195
a shock absorber bush excessively worn7,030
a shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not function or showing signs of severe leakage6,987
tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements6,171
a tyre seriously damaged5,166
exhaust system leaking or insecure5,099
wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen4,566
parking brake efficiency below minimum requirement4,446
stop lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning4,372

Pass rate by fuel type

FuelTestsPass rate
Petrol295,98677.9%
Diesel4,42671.3%

By registration year

YearTestsPass rate
199714075%
Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements
199823670.8%
Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced
199940863.7%
Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced
200035169.2%
Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn
200175365.1%
Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
20021,39264.9%
Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced
20032,46766.2%
Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, body, cab or chassis excessively corroded at a mounting point
20043,32565.7%
Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced
20053,95065.6%
Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced
20064,87364.4%
Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced
20076,97765.1%
Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
20088,76864.9%
Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced
200934,44472.8%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, parking brake efficiency below minimum requirement, exhaust system leaking or insecure
201034,50073.4%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, parking brake efficiency below minimum requirement, a shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not function or showing signs of severe leakage
201129,54176.1%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a shock absorber bush excessively worn, a shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not function or showing signs of severe leakage
201229,98277.7%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a shock absorber bush excessively worn, a shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not function or showing signs of severe leakage
201331,86479.6%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a shock absorber bush excessively worn, a shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not function or showing signs of severe leakage
201431,24381.1%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not function or showing signs of severe leakage, a shock absorber bush excessively worn
201522,36281%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not function or showing signs of severe leakage, a shock absorber bush excessively worn
201612,43582.1%
Top failures: a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened, a shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not function or showing signs of severe leakage, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn
201712,53189.4%
Top failures: a tyre seriously damaged, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm
201813,08788.7%
Top failures: a steering ball joint with excessive wear or free play, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, a tyre seriously damaged
201914,76192.6%
Top failures: tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, a tyre seriously damaged

Mileage at test

25th percentile
22,452 mi
Median
32,679 mi
75th percentile
45,852 mi

Checking a specific vehicle? This page shows overall model statistics. To check the MOT history of an individual car, use the government service.

Check MOT history on GOV.UK