Toyota Rav-4
MOT data from 48,140 tests in 2024. Pass rate: 77.8%. Average mileage at test: 113,329 miles.
Common failure reasons
| Reason | Count |
|---|---|
| a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | 1,539 |
| a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc | 1,490 |
| the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired | 1,339 |
| a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | 1,258 |
| the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | 1,129 |
| a rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources | 1,002 |
| brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded | 952 |
| a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm | 846 |
| wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen | 831 |
| tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements | 782 |
Pass rate by fuel type
| Fuel | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| Diesel | 32,618 | 78.2% |
| Petrol | 15,512 | 77.1% |
By registration year
| Year | Tests | Pass rate | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 193 | 73.6% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, emissions levels exceed the manufacturer's specified limits, emissions levels exceed default limits | |||
| 1997 | 428 | 70.8% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, emissions levels exceed default limits, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired | |||
| 1998 | 447 | 73.2% | |
| Top failures: vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot severely deteriorated | |||
| 1999 | 429 | 73.9% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot severely deteriorated, emissions test unable to be completed | |||
| 2000 | 442 | 77.4% | |
| Top failures: wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, emissions levels exceed the manufacturer's specified limits | |||
| 2001 | 972 | 76.6% | |
| Top failures: headlamp reflector or lens slightly defective, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | |||
| 2002 | 1,616 | 74.1% | |
| Top failures: the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, headlamp reflector or lens slightly defective | |||
| 2003 | 2,575 | 75.4% | |
| Top failures: the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired | |||
| 2004 | 3,780 | 75.6% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | |||
| 2005 | 5,001 | 76.1% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | |||
| 2006 | 5,141 | 72.7% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | |||
| 2007 | 4,298 | 73.5% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | |||
| 2008 | 2,597 | 74.9% | |
| Top failures: a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | |||
| 2009 | 2,603 | 80.1% | |
| Top failures: a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | |||
| 2010 | 5,520 | 80.6% | |
| Top failures: a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, a rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources | |||
| 2011 | 5,335 | 81.3% | |
| Top failures: a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | |||
| 2012 | 2,771 | 83.7% | |
| Top failures: a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm | |||
| 2013 | 2,098 | 86.5% | |
| Top failures: a tyre pressure monitoring system malfunctioning or obviously inoperative, brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm | |||
| 2014 | 1,759 | 87.6% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, a tyre seriously damaged | |||
Mileage at test
25th percentile
84,687 mi
Median
106,934 mi
75th percentile
129,365 mi
Checking a specific vehicle? This page shows overall model statistics. To check the MOT history of an individual car, use the government service.
Check MOT history on GOV.UK