motdata.uk

Mitsubishi Pajero

Overall MOT pass rate
71.8% 6.5% vs UK average

From 3,416 MOT tests. Average for its class.

0.02 failures per 10,000 miles when adjusted for the 142,137-mile median distance driven.
Want to check a specific Pajero? Enter the reg for its full MOT history.Check a reg

Common MOT failure categories

the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired6.2%
body, cab or chassis excessively corroded at a mounting point5.6%
vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced4.3%
the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired4.3%
a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn3.8%
brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded3.8%
Full breakdown

Pass rate by registration year

75.9%
99
66.4%
01
58.2%
02
73.7%
03
69.9%
04
77%
05
73.6%
06
74%
07

Newer Pajeros fare better: 2007 models pass at 74% vs 69.9% for 2004.

Pass rate by fuel type

Diesel
70.6%
2,618 tests
Petrol
75.7%
797 tests

What goes wrong?

The most common MOT failure reasons are the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, body, cab or chassis excessively corroded at a mounting point and vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced. The top issue, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, caused 212 failures in 2024. If you need repairs before retesting, sites like BookMyGarage let you compare local prices.

the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired212
body, cab or chassis excessively corroded at a mounting point192
vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced147
the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired146
a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn130
brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded129
an obligatory rear fog lamp missing, or a front or rear fog lamp inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning122
the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements98
exhaust system leaking or insecure85
a rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources84

How serious are these failures?

Not all MOT failures are equal. 43.9% of Pajero failures could actually strand you: fractured springs, engine faults, exhaust problems. Another 19.3% are safety issues where the car still drives but shouldn't, such as worn brakes, corroded brake pipes, and steering wear. Breakdown cover may be worth considering for this model. When it does fail, the average repair bill is around £184.

Fuel type matters

Petrol versions pass at 75.7% while Diesel versions pass at 70.6%, a 5 percentage point gap.

Mitsubishi Pajero on UK roads

The fleet is shrinking: 73 scrapped or exported in the past year with only 5 newly registered, a net loss of 68. At this rate, roughly 11 years until none remain. Now at 23.6% of its peak (3,173 in 2007 Q4).

155
on the road
594
off road (SORN)
+5
registered
-73
scrapped / exported
Quarterly breakdown
QuarterOn roadSORNNewGoneNet
2025 Q3155594+2-7-5
2025 Q2166588+1-13-12
2025 Q1178588+0-18-18
2024 Q4195589+2-35-33
2024 Q3196621+0-16-16
2024 Q2204629+1-10-9
2024 Q1217625+3-4-1
2023 Q4221622+0-12-12

Source: DfT vehicle licensing statistics, 2025 Q3. Crown copyright, OGL v3.0.

By registration year

YearPass rateTop failures
200774%the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn
200673.6%exhaust system leaking or insecure, brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
200577%body, cab or chassis excessively corroded at a mounting point, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
200469.9%body, cab or chassis excessively corroded at a mounting point, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn
7 earlier years
200373.7%vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced, body, cab or chassis excessively corroded at a mounting point
200258.2%a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
200166.4%the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced
199975.9%the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements
199876.7%brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced
199664.6%the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, body, cab or chassis excessively corroded at a mounting point
199578.3%vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired

Typical mileage

Half of all Pajeros tested had between 105,445 and 197,023 miles on the clock. A significant number are high-mileage vehicles.

105,445
197,023
median: 142,137 miles

At 142,137 median miles, the Pajero has 0.02 failures per 10,000 miles driven.

Other Mitsubishi models

Mitsubishi L20076.9%
Mitsubishi Outlander80.9%
Mitsubishi Shogun76.8%
Mitsubishi Asx79.9%
Mitsubishi Colt64.6%

Common questions

What is the Mitsubishi Pajero MOT pass rate?

The Mitsubishi Pajero has a 71.8% MOT pass rate based on 3,416 real MOT tests. This is around the national average.

What are common MOT failures on a Mitsubishi Pajero?

The most common MOT failure on the Mitsubishi Pajero is the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, which caused 212 failures. Other common issues include body, cab or chassis excessively corroded at a mounting point.

How many Mitsubishi Pajeros are on UK roads?

There are 155 Mitsubishi Pajeros currently licensed on UK roads, with 594 on SORN.

What is the typical mileage of a Mitsubishi Pajero at MOT?

The median mileage at MOT for a Mitsubishi Pajero is 142,137 miles. The middle 50% of vehicles tested have between 105,445 and 197,023 miles.

Buying a used Pajero?

Start with the free tools. Look up the specific vehicle's MOT history on GOV.UK The mileage at each test will show if it's been wound back, and the advisory history tells you what's wearing. Cross-reference that against the typical failures above to see if anything looks unusual for this model.

The free data won't tell you about outstanding finance, theft markers, or write-off history. For that, you need a vehicle history check This is especially important on a private sale where you have fewer legal protections.

With a 71.8% pass rate and an average repair bill of £184 when things go wrong, budget accordingly. 43.9% of failures on this model could actually strand you, so breakdown cover may be worth considering.

Some links are to services we may earn from. Disclosure.

MOT data from DVSA anonymised test results, 2024 test year. Fleet data from DfT vehicle licensing statistics. Crown copyright, OGL v3.0. MOT pass rates are statistical summaries of test outcomes, not assessments of individual vehicle safety or condition. Always inspect a vehicle and check its full MOT history before purchasing. See terms of use.