motdata.uk

Toyota Land Cruiser

Overall MOT pass rate
78.7% +0.4% vs UK average

From 27,791 MOT tests. Above average for its class.

0.013 failures per 10,000 miles when adjusted for the 159,741-mile median distance driven.
Want to check a specific Land Cruiser? Enter the reg for its full MOT history.Check a reg

Common MOT failure categories

a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn4.0%
the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired2.5%
body, cab or chassis excessively corroded at a mounting point1.9%
a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning1.8%
a rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources1.7%
the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired1.6%
Full breakdown

Pass rate by registration year

88.5%
15
86.8%
16
88.8%
17
91.3%
18
89.3%
19
88.4%
20
92.5%
21
93.1%
22

Newer Land Cruisers fare better: 2022 models pass at 93.1% vs 78.2% for 1994.

Pass rate by fuel type

Diesel
78.7%
25,650 tests
Petrol
79.3%
1,995 tests
LP
65.9%
138 tests

What goes wrong?

The most common MOT failure reasons are a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, body and cab or chassis excessively corroded at a mounting point. The top issue, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, caused 1,108 failures in 2024. If you need repairs before retesting, sites like BookMyGarage let you compare local prices.

a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn1,108
the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired681
body, cab or chassis excessively corroded at a mounting point530
a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning508
a rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources479
the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired451
a transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc450
vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced450
the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements445
brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded427

How serious are these failures?

Not all MOT failures are equal. 36.8% of Land Cruiser failures could actually strand you: fractured springs, engine faults, exhaust problems. Another 27.8% are safety issues where the car still drives but shouldn't, such as worn brakes, corroded brake pipes, and steering wear. Breakdown cover may be worth considering for this model. When it does fail, the average repair bill is around £170.

Fuel type matters

Petrol versions pass at 79.3% while LP versions pass at 65.9%, a 13 percentage point gap.

By registration year

YearPass rateTop failures
202293.1%number plate showing an incorrect registration, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn
202192.5%wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm
202088.4%a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, a tyre seriously damaged
201989.3%a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
29 earlier years
201891.3%a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, a tyre seriously damaged
201788.8%a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
201686.8%a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, a tyre pressure monitoring system malfunctioning or obviously inoperative
201588.5%a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake
201489.5%parking brake efficiency below minimum requirement, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm
201387.2%a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn
201282%a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, exhaust system leaking or insecure
201190.1%brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded, significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake
201076.7%a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements
200975.7%a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc
200875.9%a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc
200774.6%a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc
200671.9%a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources
200573.8%a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
200470.3%a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, body, cab or chassis excessively corroded at a mounting point
200369.9%body, cab or chassis excessively corroded at a mounting point, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced
200272.4%a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
200169.5%a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
200073.3%the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn
199971%a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
199872.1%body, cab or chassis excessively corroded at a mounting point, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn
199772.2%the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
199674.7%brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
199576.9%the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a headlamp or light source missing, inoperative or more than ½ not functioning in the case of led
199478.2%parking brake efficiency below minimum requirement, exhaust system leaking or insecure
199380.1%a wheel bearing with excessive play, wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
199278.6%the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn
199175.2%body, cab or chassis excessively corroded at a mounting point, a wheel bearing with excessive play
199079.8%a headlamp or light source missing, inoperative or more than ½ not functioning in the case of led, parking brake efficiency below minimum requirement

Typical mileage

Half of all Land Cruisers tested had between 118,441 and 223,740 miles on the clock. A significant number are high-mileage vehicles.

118,441
223,740
median: 159,741 miles

At 159,741 median miles, the Land Cruiser has 0.013 failures per 10,000 miles driven.

Other Toyota models

Toyota Yaris76%
Toyota Aygo78.9%
Toyota Prius82.4%
Toyota Auris76.7%
Toyota Rav482.8%

Common questions

What is the Toyota Land Cruiser MOT pass rate?

The Toyota Land Cruiser has a 78.7% MOT pass rate based on 27,791 real MOT tests. This is above the national average.

What are common MOT failures on a Toyota Land Cruiser?

The most common MOT failure on the Toyota Land Cruiser is a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, which caused 1,108 failures. Other common issues include the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired.

What is the typical mileage of a Toyota Land Cruiser at MOT?

The median mileage at MOT for a Toyota Land Cruiser is 159,741 miles. The middle 50% of vehicles tested have between 118,441 and 223,740 miles.

Buying a used Land Cruiser?

Start with the free tools. Look up the specific vehicle's MOT history on GOV.UK The mileage at each test will show if it's been wound back, and the advisory history tells you what's wearing. Cross-reference that against the typical failures above to see if anything looks unusual for this model.

The free data won't tell you about outstanding finance, theft markers, or write-off history. For that, you need a vehicle history check This is especially important on a private sale where you have fewer legal protections.

With a 78.7% pass rate and an average repair bill of £170 when things go wrong, budget accordingly. 36.8% of failures on this model could actually strand you, so breakdown cover may be worth considering.

Some links are to services we may earn from. Disclosure.

MOT data from DVSA anonymised test results, 2024 test year. Fleet data from DfT vehicle licensing statistics. Crown copyright, OGL v3.0. MOT pass rates are statistical summaries of test outcomes, not assessments of individual vehicle safety or condition. Always inspect a vehicle and check its full MOT history before purchasing. See terms of use.