Fiat Doblo
MOT data from 68,470 tests in 2024. Pass rate: 76.3%. Average mileage at test: 87,733 miles.
Common failure reasons
| Reason | Count |
|---|---|
| a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | 3,045 |
| a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened | 2,465 |
| the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | 1,731 |
| tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements | 1,619 |
| a tyre cords visible or damaged | 1,289 |
| engine mil illuminated indicating a malfunction | 1,288 |
| a tyre seriously damaged | 1,162 |
| wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen | 1,110 |
| a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc | 1,104 |
| exhaust system leaking or insecure | 1,089 |
Pass rate by fuel type
| Fuel | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| Diesel | 59,567 | 75.9% |
| Petrol | 8,896 | 78.8% |
By registration year
| Year | Tests | Pass rate | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 101 | 65.3% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | |||
| 2002 | 344 | 66.3% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | |||
| 2003 | 738 | 66.9% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | |||
| 2004 | 1,261 | 67% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | |||
| 2005 | 1,622 | 68% | |
| Top failures: the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired | |||
| 2006 | 2,459 | 71.5% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | |||
| 2007 | 3,403 | 70.6% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | |||
| 2008 | 3,040 | 73.2% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, exhaust system leaking or insecure | |||
| 2009 | 2,451 | 75.6% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, exhaust system leaking or insecure, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | |||
| 2010 | 2,437 | 74.3% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened | |||
| 2011 | 2,540 | 73.3% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements | |||
| 2012 | 2,935 | 72.8% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements | |||
| 2013 | 10,512 | 81.4% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened, a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc | |||
| 2014 | 9,822 | 75.8% | |
| Top failures: a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc | |||
| 2015 | 7,499 | 77.4% | |
| Top failures: a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements | |||
| 2016 | 5,590 | 76.9% | |
| Top failures: a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a tyre cords visible or damaged | |||
| 2017 | 3,810 | 77.9% | |
| Top failures: a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, engine mil illuminated indicating a malfunction | |||
| 2018 | 2,916 | 81.1% | |
| Top failures: a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened, engine mil illuminated indicating a malfunction, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements | |||
| 2019 | 2,564 | 80.5% | |
| Top failures: a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened, engine mil illuminated indicating a malfunction, a tyre seriously damaged | |||
| 2020 | 1,148 | 81.4% | |
| Top failures: engine mil illuminated indicating a malfunction, a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened, a tyre cords visible or damaged | |||
| 2021 | 1,266 | 79.9% | |
| Top failures: brake pedal anti-slip provision missing, loose or worn smooth, engine mil illuminated indicating a malfunction, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | |||
Mileage at test
25th percentile
36,343 mi
Median
57,459 mi
75th percentile
90,953 mi
Checking a specific vehicle? This page shows overall model statistics. To check the MOT history of an individual car, use the government service.
Check MOT history on GOV.UK