MOTmotdata.uk

Fiat Panda

MOT data from 146,414 tests in 2024. Pass rate: 76%. Average mileage at test: 63,687 miles.

Common failure reasons

ReasonCount
a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn9,420
tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements5,018
a shock absorber bush excessively worn4,165
a shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not function or showing signs of severe leakage3,168
wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen2,888
exhaust system leaking or insecure2,749
the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired2,659
parking brake efficiency below minimum requirement2,601
a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened2,514
a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning2,441

Pass rate by fuel type

FuelTestsPass rate
Petrol136,59076.2%
Diesel9,80873.2%

By registration year

YearTestsPass rate
198810377.7%
Top failures: a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, service brake efficiency below minimum requirement
198911379.6%
Top failures: the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning
199011873.7%
Top failures: the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, brakes imbalance across an axle such that the braking effort from any wheel is less than 70% of the maximum effort recorded from the other wheel on the same axle., braking effort inadequate at a wheel
199110471.2%
Top failures: the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
199213973.4%
Top failures: the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, brakes imbalance across an axle such that the braking effort from any wheel is less than 70% of the maximum effort recorded from the other wheel on the same axle., service brake efficiency below minimum requirement
199316669.9%
Top failures: the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced, emissions levels exceed default limits
200312671.4%
Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a steering ball joint with excessive wear or free play
20044,73566.2%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, parking brake efficiency below minimum requirement
20055,37768.7%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, parking brake efficiency below minimum requirement
20067,11868%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
20079,05269%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
20088,48070.2%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
200917,36872%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, a shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not function or showing signs of severe leakage
201015,57772.4%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, a shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not function or showing signs of severe leakage
20119,07673.5%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, a shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not function or showing signs of severe leakage
201210,17777.7%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a shock absorber bush excessively worn, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
201312,05878.9%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened, a shock absorber bush excessively worn
201412,18180.6%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a shock absorber bush excessively worn, a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened
201512,00881.3%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a shock absorber bush excessively worn, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
20167,26283.5%
Top failures: a shock absorber bush excessively worn, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a tyre seriously damaged
20175,21985.4%
Top failures: a shock absorber bush excessively worn, wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen, a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened
20183,85287.6%
Top failures: a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened, wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
20193,68688.4%
Top failures: a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened, wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen, a tyre seriously damaged
20201,95593.9%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen, a tyre cords visible or damaged
202111190.1%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, parking brake efficiency below minimum requirement, windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen

Mileage at test

25th percentile
35,266 mi
Median
43,347 mi
75th percentile
70,068 mi

Checking a specific vehicle? This page shows overall model statistics. To check the MOT history of an individual car, use the government service.

Check MOT history on GOV.UK