motdata.uk

Mazda MX-5

Overall MOT pass rate
78.7% +0.4% vs UK average

From 167,686 MOT tests. Above average for its class.

0.025 failures per 10,000 miles when adjusted for the 84,631-mile median distance driven.
Want to check a specific MX-5? Enter the reg for its full MOT history.Check a reg

Common MOT failure categories

the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired2.9%
a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened2.1%
significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake2.1%
a suspension joint dust cover severely deteriorated1.7%
the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired1.6%
the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements1.6%
Full breakdown

Pass rate by registration year

86%
14
87.3%
15
89.2%
16
91.5%
17
91.9%
18
92%
19
93.3%
20
93.6%
21

Newer MX-5s fare better: 2021 models pass at 93.6% vs 75.5% for 1990.

What goes wrong?

The most common MOT failure reasons are the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened and significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake. The top issue, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, caused 4,899 failures in 2024. If you need repairs before retesting, sites like BookMyGarage let you compare local prices.

the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired4,899
a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened3,603
significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake3,453
a suspension joint dust cover severely deteriorated2,771
the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired2,763
the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements2,681
a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc2,622
vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced2,350
a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn2,284
lambda coefficient outside the default limits or the range specified by the manufacturer2,224

How serious are these failures?

Not all MOT failures are equal. 45.9% of MX-5 failures could actually strand you: fractured springs, engine faults, exhaust problems. Another 19.3% are safety issues where the car still drives but shouldn't, such as worn brakes, corroded brake pipes, and steering wear. Breakdown cover may be worth considering for this model. When it does fail, the average repair bill is around £184.

Mazda MX-5 on UK roads

The fleet is shrinking: 3,122 scrapped or exported in the past year with only 1,392 newly registered, a net loss of 1,730. At this rate, roughly 65.6 years until none remain.

84,620
on the road
28,775
off road (SORN)
+1,392
registered
-3,122
scrapped / exported
Quarterly breakdown
QuarterOn roadSORNNewGoneNet
2025 Q384,62028,775+505-620-115
2025 Q285,74927,761+421-166+255
2025 Q180,14533,110+303-639-336
2024 Q479,80433,787+163-1,697-1,534
2024 Q386,27628,849+305-575-270
2024 Q287,45627,939+423-0+2,171
2024 Q183,03230,192+392-3,055-2,663
2023 Q482,18833,699+197-585-388
20 variants on the road
VariantFuelLicensedShare
Mx-5Petrol21,04135%
Mx-5 SportPetrol7,15912%
Mx-5 Sport NavPetrol4,4657%
Mx-5 I Roadster SePetrol3,6246%
Mx-5 Rf Sport NavPetrol2,8755%
Mx-5 I Roadster Sport TechPetrol2,6354%
Mx-5 I SePetrol2,0703%
Mx-5 I Roadster Spt TechPetrol1,9063%
Mx-5 S-Vt SportPetrol1,8333%
Mx-5 1.8IGas1,7823%
Mx-5 IconPetrol1,4332%
Mx-5 Exclusive-LinePetrol1,3242%
Mx-5 Se-L NavPetrol1,2572%
Mx5 EuphonicGas1,1732%
Mx-5 Rf Sport Nav +Petrol1,0982%
Mx-5 I Rd-Ter Sport Venture EdPetrol1,0912%
Mx-5 I Roadster Venture EdPetrol1,0762%
Mx-5 SPetrol1,0682%
Mx-5 Sport Nav +Petrol9572%
Mx-5 Rf Exclusive-LinePetrol9352%

Source: DfT vehicle licensing statistics, 2025 Q3. Crown copyright, OGL v3.0.

By registration year

YearPass rateTop failures
202193.6%a tyre seriously damaged, a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened
202093.3%a tyre seriously damaged, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn
201992%a tyre seriously damaged, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm
201891.9%a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, a tyre seriously damaged
28 earlier years
201791.5%a tyre seriously damaged, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm
201689.2%significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm
201587.3%significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn
201486%a tyre seriously damaged, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn
201383.9%a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened, a tyre seriously damaged
201282.4%a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened, significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake
201180.1%a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened, significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake
201079.4%a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened, significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake
200978.2%a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened, significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake
200876.1%a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened, significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake
200776.6%the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened
200674.2%the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened
200570.5%the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
200471.3%the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
200371.3%the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced
200271.2%the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
200170.8%the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, emissions levels exceed default limits
200070%emissions levels exceed default limits, emissions levels exceed the manufacturer's specified limits
199969.7%emissions levels exceed default limits, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
199872.7%emissions levels exceed default limits, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
199773.9%the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements
199672.8%the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
199573%the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced
199473.7%the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension joint dust cover severely deteriorated
199372.1%the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
199275.2%the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements
199174.7%the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
199075.5%the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired

Typical mileage

Half of all MX-5s tested had between 61,378 and 103,059 miles on the clock. A significant number are high-mileage vehicles.

61,378
103,059
median: 84,631 miles

At 84,631 median miles, the MX-5 has 0.025 failures per 10,000 miles driven.

Other Mazda models

Mazda 274.5%
Mazda 375.2%
Mazda 675.5%
Mazda CX-584.2%
Mazda CX-387.3%

Common questions

What is the Mazda MX-5 MOT pass rate?

The Mazda MX-5 has a 78.7% MOT pass rate based on 167,686 real MOT tests. This is above the national average.

What are common MOT failures on a Mazda MX-5?

The most common MOT failure on the Mazda MX-5 is the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, which caused 4,899 failures. Other common issues include a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened.

How many Mazda MX-5s are on UK roads?

There are 84,620 Mazda MX-5s currently licensed on UK roads, with 28,775 on SORN.

What is the typical mileage of a Mazda MX-5 at MOT?

The median mileage at MOT for a Mazda MX-5 is 84,631 miles. The middle 50% of vehicles tested have between 61,378 and 103,059 miles.

Buying a used MX-5?

Start with the free tools. Look up the specific vehicle's MOT history on GOV.UK The mileage at each test will show if it's been wound back, and the advisory history tells you what's wearing. Cross-reference that against the typical failures above to see if anything looks unusual for this model.

The free data won't tell you about outstanding finance, theft markers, or write-off history. For that, you need a vehicle history check This is especially important on a private sale where you have fewer legal protections.

With a 78.7% pass rate and an average repair bill of £184 when things go wrong, budget accordingly. 45.9% of failures on this model could actually strand you, so breakdown cover may be worth considering.

Some links are to services we may earn from. Disclosure.

MOT data from DVSA anonymised test results, 2024 test year. Fleet data from DfT vehicle licensing statistics. Crown copyright, OGL v3.0. MOT pass rates are statistical summaries of test outcomes, not assessments of individual vehicle safety or condition. Always inspect a vehicle and check its full MOT history before purchasing. See terms of use.