Suzuki Gsxr600
MotorcycleFrom 5,600 MOT tests. Above average for its class.
Common MOT failure categories
Pass rate by registration year
Newer Gsxr600s fare better: 2009 models pass at 84.3% vs 76.6% for 1999.
What goes wrong?
The most common MOT failure reasons are a direction indicator lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, a shock absorber not functioning or leaking severely and number plate does not conform to the specified requirements. The top issue, a direction indicator lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, caused 109 failures in 2024. Checking tread depth (1.6mm legal minimum, 3mm recommended) before your test can save an unnecessary fail. You can check prices at Black Circles if you need replacements. If you need repairs before retesting, sites like BookMyGarage let you compare local prices.
| a direction indicator lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | 109 |
| a shock absorber not functioning or leaking severely | 106 |
| number plate does not conform to the specified requirements | 65 |
| tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements | 61 |
| significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake | 54 |
| excessive fluctuation in brake effort through each wheel revolution | 50 |
| reflector missing or reflecting white to the rear | 49 |
| audible warning not working | 49 |
| stop lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | 41 |
| lamp emitted colour, position or intensity not in accordance with the requirements | 41 |
How serious are these failures?
Not all MOT failures are equal. Only 16.6% of Gsxr600 failures are serious (safety or roadside), below the 44.4% average. When this car fails its MOT, it's more likely to be lights, wipers, or emissions than something dangerous. When it does fail, the average repair bill is around £56.
By registration year
| Year | Pass rate | Top failures |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 84.3% | a shock absorber not functioning or leaking severely, steering head bearings excessively stiff, notchy, or with excessive wear or play |
| 2008 | 82.2% | a direction indicator lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, a rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps |
| 2007 | 84.2% | tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, a wheel bearing excessively rough |
| 2006 | 86.5% | reflector missing or reflecting white to the rear, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements |
9 earlier years
| 2005 | 81.3% | lamp emitted colour, position or intensity not in accordance with the requirements, a shock absorber not functioning or leaking severely |
| 2004 | 82.5% | a direction indicator lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, a headlamp missing, inoperative or more than ½ not functioning in the case of led |
| 2003 | 80.2% | a direction indicator lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, a shock absorber not functioning or leaking severely |
| 2002 | 82.2% | a direction indicator lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, stop lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning |
| 2001 | 82.8% | a direction indicator lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, stop lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning |
| 2000 | 83.5% | a shock absorber not functioning or leaking severely, significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake |
| 1999 | 76.6% | a direction indicator lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake |
| 1998 | 80.6% | a shock absorber not functioning or leaking severely, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements |
| 1997 | 76% | reflector missing or reflecting white to the rear, excessive fluctuation in brake effort through each wheel revolution |
Typical mileage
Half of all Gsxr600s tested had between 17,815 and 33,145 miles on the clock. Relatively low mileage overall. Many are still fairly young.
At 24,908 median miles, the Gsxr600 has 0.074 failures per 10,000 miles driven.
Other Suzuki models
| Suzuki Swift | 75.7% |
| Suzuki Vitara | 85.6% |
| Suzuki Alto | 71.8% |
| Suzuki Sx4 | 76.6% |
| Suzuki Jimny | 74.9% |
Common questions
What is the Suzuki Gsxr600 MOT pass rate?
The Suzuki Gsxr600 has a 81.5% MOT pass rate based on 5,600 real MOT tests. This is above the national average.
What are common MOT failures on a Suzuki Gsxr600?
The most common MOT failure on the Suzuki Gsxr600 is a direction indicator lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, which caused 109 failures. Other common issues include a shock absorber not functioning or leaking severely.
What is the typical mileage of a Suzuki Gsxr600 at MOT?
The median mileage at MOT for a Suzuki Gsxr600 is 24,908 miles. The middle 50% of vehicles tested have between 17,815 and 33,145 miles.
MOT data from DVSA anonymised test results, 2024 test year. Fleet data from DfT vehicle licensing statistics. Crown copyright, OGL v3.0. MOT pass rates are statistical summaries of test outcomes, not assessments of individual vehicle safety or condition. Always inspect a vehicle and check its full MOT history before purchasing. See terms of use.