motdata.uk

Volkswagen Polo

Overall MOT pass rate
73.8% 4.5% vs UK average

From 1,030,915 MOT tests. Average for its class.

0.025 failures per 10,000 miles when adjusted for the 103,248-mile median distance driven.
Want to check a specific Polo? Enter the reg for its full MOT history.Check a reg

Common MOT failure categories

a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn3.6%
the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements2.5%
a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc2.1%
tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements2.1%
steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc2.0%
a rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources1.6%
Full breakdown

Pass rate by registration year

78.8%
15
80.8%
16
81.7%
17
81.2%
18
85.9%
19
89.6%
20
90.2%
21
95.1%
22

Newer Polos fare better: 2022 models pass at 95.1% vs 72.1% for 1991.

Pass rate by fuel type

Petrol
74.4%
946,466 tests
Diesel
67.9%
84,402 tests

What goes wrong?

The most common MOT failure reasons are a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements and a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc. The top issue, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, caused 36,904 failures in 2024. Checking tread depth (1.6mm legal minimum, 3mm recommended) before your test can save an unnecessary fail. You can check prices at Black Circles if you need replacements. If you need repairs before retesting, sites like BookMyGarage let you compare local prices.

a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn36,904
the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements25,297
a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc21,820
tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements21,273
steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc20,836
a rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources16,447
a transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc16,350
windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen16,023
a tyre seriously damaged15,522
parking brake efficiency below minimum requirement14,686

How serious are these failures?

Not all MOT failures are equal. 40.7% of failures are serious: 32.7% are safety issues (brakes, steering, tyre damage) and 8% could actually leave you stranded. That's close to the 44.4% average across all models. When it does fail, the average repair bill is around £95.

The warranty question

A 3-year-old Polo passes its MOT 89.6% of the time. By 7 years old that drops to 80.8%, a 8.8 percentage point fall, right as the manufacturer warranty runs out. At 10 years it's down to 73.3%. With an average repair bill of £95 when things go wrong, an extended warranty can make sense on a Polo that's past its third birthday.

Fuel type matters

Petrol versions pass at 74.4% while Diesel versions pass at 67.9%, a 7 percentage point gap.

Volkswagen Polo on UK roads

The fleet is growing: 26,209 newly registered in the past year with 24,547 leaving, a net gain of 1,662. Currently at its highest numbers ever.

664,607
on the road
47,188
off road (SORN)
+26,209
registered
-24,547
scrapped / exported
Quarterly breakdown
QuarterOn roadSORNNewGoneNet
2025 Q3664,60747,188+6,979-6,986-7
2025 Q2665,45046,352+6,167-6,125+42
2025 Q1665,62046,140+7,609-6,510+1,099
2024 Q4665,36445,297+5,454-4,926+528
2024 Q3665,71244,421+8,832-6,966+1,866
2024 Q2664,45443,813+9,026-6,319+2,707
2024 Q1661,64843,912+6,338-5,155+1,183
2023 Q4661,57042,807+8,609-3,513+5,096
20 variants on the road
VariantFuelLicensedShare
Polo Se TsiPetrol52,34413%
Polo Match TsiPetrol42,21310%
Polo SePetrol36,3699%
Polo Match EditionPetrol34,3818%
Polo Match 60Petrol30,6577%
Polo S 60Petrol26,3326%
Polo Life TsiPetrol22,3225%
Polo Se Tsi S-APetrol16,5914%
Polo Match Tsi S-APetrol16,3694%
Polo MatchPetrol16,0094%
Polo Match Edition TsiPetrol14,6734%
Polo R-Line TsiPetrol14,5924%
Polo LifePetrol13,8933%
Polo Life Tsi S-APetrol12,3563%
Polo R-Line Tsi S-APetrol11,9563%
Polo Match 85Petrol11,6403%
Polo Se EvoPetrol11,5923%
Polo Se 85Petrol9,3212%
Polo Sel TsiPetrol8,7042%
Polo SGas7,8832%

Source: DfT vehicle licensing statistics, 2025 Q3. Crown copyright, OGL v3.0.

By registration year

YearPass rateTop failures
202295.1%windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured and affecting the driver's view of the road or of an obligatory external mirror, a headlamp or light source missing, inoperative or more than ½ not functioning in the case of led
202190.2%a tyre seriously damaged, wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
202089.6%wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
201985.9%steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc, wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
34 earlier years
201881.2%steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc, steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated
201781.7%a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
201680.8%a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
201578.8%a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
201475.1%a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
201373.3%a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources
201272%a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not function or showing signs of severe leakage
201169.9%a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not function or showing signs of severe leakage
201068.9%a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn
200966.7%a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn
200864.5%a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc, a transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc
200764.5%a transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc, a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc
200662.3%a transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements
200561.3%the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, a transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc
200461.3%the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn
200360.7%the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn
200262.1%the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn
200164%the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn
200065.9%the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn
199970.4%the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, emissions levels exceed default limits
199864.9%the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
199768.2%the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced
199666.8%the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn
199567.7%the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
199468.5%emissions levels exceed the manufacturer's specified limits, a tyre seriously damaged
199366%emissions levels exceed the manufacturer's specified limits, emissions levels exceed default limits
199273.2%a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
199172.1%the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
199072.1%brakes imbalance across an axle such that the braking effort from any wheel is less than 70% of the maximum effort recorded from the other wheel on the same axle., the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
198966.4%the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, emissions levels exceed default limits
198866.3%a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
198761.8%the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, brakes imbalance across an axle such that the braking effort from any wheel is less than 70% of the maximum effort recorded from the other wheel on the same axle.
198661%emissions levels exceed default limits, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
198575.4%a direction indicator lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen

Typical mileage

Half of all Polos tested had between 67,192 and 131,042 miles on the clock. A significant number are high-mileage vehicles.

67,192
131,042
median: 103,248 miles

At 103,248 median miles, the Polo has 0.025 failures per 10,000 miles driven.

Other Volkswagen models

Volkswagen Golf79.1%
Volkswagen Transporter73.8%
Volkswagen Tiguan84.6%
Volkswagen Passat76.9%
Volkswagen Caddy76.4%

Common questions

What is the Volkswagen Polo MOT pass rate?

The Volkswagen Polo has a 73.8% MOT pass rate based on 1,030,915 real MOT tests. This is around the national average.

What are common MOT failures on a Volkswagen Polo?

The most common MOT failure on the Volkswagen Polo is a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, which caused 36,904 failures. Other common issues include the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements.

How many Volkswagen Polos are on UK roads?

There are 664,607 Volkswagen Polos currently licensed on UK roads, with 47,188 on SORN.

What is the typical mileage of a Volkswagen Polo at MOT?

The median mileage at MOT for a Volkswagen Polo is 103,248 miles. The middle 50% of vehicles tested have between 67,192 and 131,042 miles.

Buying a used Polo?

Start with the free tools. Look up the specific vehicle's MOT history on GOV.UK The mileage at each test will show if it's been wound back, and the advisory history tells you what's wearing. Cross-reference that against the typical failures above to see if anything looks unusual for this model.

The free data won't tell you about outstanding finance, theft markers, or write-off history. For that, you need a vehicle history check This is especially important on a private sale where you have fewer legal protections.

With a 73.8% pass rate and an average repair bill of £95 when things go wrong, budget accordingly.

Some links are to services we may earn from. Disclosure.

MOT data from DVSA anonymised test results, 2024 test year. Fleet data from DfT vehicle licensing statistics. Crown copyright, OGL v3.0. MOT pass rates are statistical summaries of test outcomes, not assessments of individual vehicle safety or condition. Always inspect a vehicle and check its full MOT history before purchasing. See terms of use.